
Eades Answers Page 1:
Eades Answers Page 2:
|
 |
| Low-Carb : Eades Questions, Page 1 |
 |
|
This question and answer session was posted in 1999, but
still has relevance today.
|
| |
|
|
Q:
|
Exercise? |
 |
|
| |
I have recently read and begun the Protein Power program. I feel much better, although have not yet lost any weight. In reading the low-carb mailing list, someone recommended reading the articles on Ketogenic diet on the PowerStore Web page. I have some questions based on the article, which is presumeably based on the research of a Jeffrey Krabbe. Anyway, although the diet is more like Atkins induction, than Level I of your diet, they state that if you exercise, you have to carbo-load two days per week in order to replace necessary glycogen in your muscles. I guess this is pretty much the Anabolic diet I have heard about. They also state that this diet (low-carb) is okay for up to 12 weeks, but at that point you should go back to eating 100-300 gms carb. per day. I did not get the impression that it was only body-building type exercise that they meant. I got the impression that in order to stay on a very low-carb program, one must be sedentary or else do the carbo loading. They also say that you have to stay at 8-10 calories per pound bodyweight or below in order to lose or you will gain. It has been my impression otherwise that calories were not all that important. What is your take on this? Thanks |
| |
|
| A: |
Actually, work done by Charles Gray, M.D., at the U.S. Naval Hospital in San Diego demonstrated that performance and endurance increase on a low-carbohydrate diet -- but only after a period of low carbohydrate adaptation has taken place. In other words, you can't carbo load one day, then go low carb and expect performance to be good. It takes a little time (usually a week or so) on a fairly strict low-carb diet for the body to generate the necessary enzymes to be able to efficiently access body fat as the fuel of choice. Once that happens, both performance and endurance actually increase. These same types of studies have been performed at many other research facilities with the same results. You've got to be careful in evaluating studies on low-carb dieting because so many of them are done on subjects that aren't low-carb adapted. Before this low carb adaptation takes place, perfomance and endurance may be reduced--and many studies that bash low-carb dieting have been undertaken during this pre-adapatation phase, when performance is impaired. In other words, subjects who have been carb loading, perform much better on a higher carb diet than they do--initially--on a lower carb diet. But after the same subjects have spent a week or two adapting to a low carb diet, their performance exceeds their performance when they were carb loading. In answer to the question about calories: In order to lose, you really do have to eat fewer calories that you burn. If all your energey needs are met by the calories in your diet, there is no reason to turn to your own fat stores for energy. However, on a diet higher in protein, your metabolic rate is higher and you burn more calories than on a low-fat, high-carb diet. In addition, people on low-carb diets tend to naturally consume fewer calories, even though they eat to satisfaction, because of the appetite sating effect of protein and fat. Thanks for your question. |
| |
top |
 |
| |
|
| Q: |
Swollen
Ankles |
| |
|
| |
I have recently been diagnosed as
hypoglycemic and it was suggested that I go on a high protein/low
carb diet. I have read the diets suggested by the Hypoglycemia
Association, Inc. and Protein Power and have become quite
informed. I was on a strict (to my preference) high carbohydrate/barely
no protein diet. Currently, I have been dieting for almost
2 weeks eating 80 g prot/20 g carbs that includes mostly cruciferous
vegetables, tofu, cheese, fish, and poultry while drinking
at least 1 gallon of water per day (and sometimes 2 caffeine
free diet sodas). My question/problem is that ever since last
wednesday, my ankles and calves have been swollen. Most notably
in my ankles and a couple of times a certain food (e.g., cooked
spinach), caused the swelling to get worst such that it was
difficult to walk. I sometimes have numbness (with no pains)
and sometimes the swelling decreases, but constantly my feet
look like they belong to an 8 foot gorilla (I am 5'2" and
87 lbs). I was taking two 90 mg potassium pills per day as
suggested by PP but discontinued its immediately. Although
I should probably be "raising" my feet, I constantly sit for
my job and I constantly move about for my exercising. After
a week, the swelling went away. Then a few days later, I ate
some cooked spinach and I swelled up a little bit again! Plus
this time, my lymph nodes (or the glands inside my jawbone)
are very swollen (noticeable by others) making me feel that
I have to throw up sometimes. I have never had problems with
food allergies in the past and remember eating at the very
beginning of my diet spinach dip w/cheese. I have heard about
the oxalates in spinach but could I all of a sudden be supersensitive
to it?
Can anyone explain this or help me
remedy the problem? My doctor has been no help at all. She
is too concerned with me being underweight---another problem
I am battling. Thank you in advance for your guidance.Take
care.
|
| |
 |
| A: |
With a very specific medical
problem, such as the one you describe, it's difficult if not
impossible (not to mention potentially dangerous) to attempt
a diagnosis without taking a thorough history and doing a hands-on
physical exam with lab work. While your problem, could indeed
be a specific allergy to spinach or something in it, it could
be fifty other things. I would avoid spinach entirely for three
weeks and then try it again in a small controlled way to recheck
your suspicion. Another possibility is that the foot swelling
might be of a viral or autoimmune disorder and I would want
to make certain these possibilities were checked thoroughly
with blood work and exam. It would be a good idea to check blood
levels of sodium and potassium them. Thanks for your letter.
|
| |
|
 |
| |
| Q: |
Low Glycemic Index |
| |
|
| |
What is your feeling on
'low glycemic index' programs (ie; Montignac, Sugarbusters)
vs. your type of program? Also what are your thoughts on low
carb eating during pregnancy? I am NOT asking your advice, I
am asking more hypothetically-speaking :). Common sense would
tell me that our ancestors managed to have children without
eating alot of refined carbs, but I am interested in what might
be considered the best level (number of grams-wise). I am at
this poing heavier (not pregnant) than I was on the day I delivered
my last child. I was on Phen/Fen two years ago, lost alot of
weight, it stopped working, I rebounded 50 pounds more than
original baseline, and cannot seem to lose weight anymore. I
was on CAD, but although it worked from a standpoint of losing
the hunger, I lost no weight. I am just beginning your program
and have high hopes, but a friend is trying to push me in the
direction of the Sugarbusters, I think it may be too high carb
to do me any good. Needless to say, I am finding the whole thing
rather confusing. I do apologize for the rambling nature of
this post. Thank You |
| |
|
| A: |
Low glycemic foods are
not always those that don't increase insulin, although there
is considerable overlap. (Please see the detailed explanation
in Protein Power, page 191 in the hardback edition.) And some
foods that have a very low glycemic index can cause other problems;
for example, fructose, a low glycemic sugar, given to diabetics
for years because it doesn't raise blood sugar levels, actually
raises triglyceride levels. Fructose, instead of converting
to glucose and running blood sugar up, converts to triglycerides
in the liver. Don't be afraid to eat a controlled amount of
the right carbohydrates (as recommended in PP). Your point about
early human mothers not eating a ton of carbs is a valid and
astute one. Traditional Eskimo mothers also eat very few carbs
and have healthy babies. And although humans probably could
survive and reproduce with none, we like to keep our pregnant
patients on a maintenance level of carbohydrate. A pregnant
woman should NEVER be in a reduced calorie state, in fact she
needs increased calories, especially in the form of protein
and good quality fats. We have them select high quality protein
from varied sources: fish (especially sardines, which are a
great source of essential fatty acids), beef, poultry, and if
possibly brands that are free-range and raised without antibiotics
or hormones. We have them eat fresh veggies (low starch varieties),
low carb fruits, organic dairy products, nuts, seeds, avocados,
olives, and their oils. As to the CAD, a large number of research
papers have shown that the best way to lower insulin levels
is to eat smaller meals spread throughout the day-- a la PP.
An equally large number have shown that a huge meal (such as
the reward meal specified in CAD) tends to cause an hyper release
of insulin--especially when the meal is in the evening. We can't
think of a single study showing that a large meal--especially
one containing all the carbohydrates you can stuff in in an
hour--reduces insulin levels. Now given this information, how
can we reconcile it with the fact that some people DO lose weight
on CAD? Here's how we think it works: Many people eat everything
they want all day long. When they begin CAD, they can only eat
everything they want for one hour during the day, so it makes
sense that they would lose some weight. Given the biochemical
realitites of the situation, we suspect that most people who
lose significant amounts of weight on CAD probably eat a sensible
low-carb reward meal most of the time. Thanks for your letter.
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| Q: |
Losing Pounds
Quick |
| |
|
| |
I know, I KNOW this is
for the long haul and we shouldn't diet harder for a special
event and yadda, yadda, yadda......but if one is trying to zip
a particular zipper ASAP...what's the fastest way to get off
5 or 6 pounds...ie: cluster carbs at breakfast? Again, delighted
to have found the book and the web site. |
| |
|
| A: |
Keep protein at the minimum
(as calculated in PP) and proportioned throughout the day in
3 meals and 1 snack. Stick to the lower fat, leaner cuts of
meat to keep calorie intake to a minimum while still getting
adequate protein to keep your metabolic rate up. Try protein
shakes a time or two a day instead of a full meal. If you must
cluster carbs, do so a little in the am, but don't go overboard
(say no more than 12 grams). Keep carbs the rest of the day
at 7 grams per meal or snack. Also don't go too heavy on fruits
while you're in "training" to zip this particular zipper. Nuts,
nut butters, and cheese are the biggest culprits in stalling
weight loss in people (especially women) who otherwise follow
the diet to the letter with respect to protein intake and carbs,
because these foods are so calorie dense. You can stand a lot
of them in maintenance, but to lose (especially the few pounds
you're talking about) avoid them or limit them to 1 ounce a
day. Thanks for the question. |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
| Q: |
Adrenalin/Thyroid |
| |
|
| |
Do you know anything about the theory
that insulin release is blunted when adrenalin is flowing?
Your book covers a lot of topics, but does not address in
particular how to sustain peak or endurance athletic performance
when starting out with reduced glycogen stores. This is of
critical interest to people who need a low-carb diet for medical
reasons but who also want to remain active. I've learned that
(apparently, based on blood test results) I can consume straightglucose/maltose/maltodextrin
candy (SweetTarts or equivalent) in moderation during exercise,
without causing hyperlipidemia. Do you have anything more
to say about this subject?
I've read that low-carb diets reduce
thyroid activity, and one blood test seems to confirm that
this has occurred in my case (after one year low-carb). I'm
more prone to feeling chilly at times, and am generally more
sluggish. Should I reduce my carb intake further (groan),
per Atkins' "critical carb level" model, or do you have any
other suggestions?
What do you think of the Hellers'
model, which is very low-carb except for one reward meal a
day? They argue that insulin release is partly dependent on
recent diet history. I haven't experimented with it myself.
Do you have any new/revised information
about eicosanoids, in particular, changes in your controversial
recommendations about ALA? I've come to believe flax seed/oil
is more good than evil. Any comments? Thank you
|
| |
|
| A: |
Dr. Chales Gray at the U.S. Naval
Hospital in San Diego has done extensive research on endurance
and the low carbohydrate diet, using both lab animals (primarily
swine) and naval recruits. He has found that performance and
endurance on a low carbohdyrate diet are impaired until a
period of low carb adaptation has taken place (usually about
a week). Once adapted, the subjects' performance and endurance
actually increase and surpass that recorded prior to the low
carb diet (i.e. on a high carb one). He has also found that
the enzymatic activity involved in the synthesis of glycogen
increases with adaptation to a low carb diet--in other words,
people who are low carb adapted make and store glycogen more
easily even in the absence of much dietary carbohydrate. (Carbohdyrate
can also be made from protein, and a small amount from the
glycerol backbone of triglycerides, so even in the absence
of dietary carbohydrate, glycogen sythesis goes on.) Dr. Gray
did find that in subjects involved in intense activity (anaerobic
exercise) performance was enhanced with the addition of small
amounts of dietary glucose (i.e., SweetTarts). The only reason
that dietary glucose would cause hyperlipidemia is if it stimulated
an excessive and prolonged insulin rise, which is difficult
to do during intense exercise because the insulin receptors
become much more sensitive at this time (i.e., it takes much
less insulin to deal with the dietary sugar when the receptors
are sensitive). One caveat, however: a number of studies have
shown that even small amounts of dietary carbohydrate during
or immediately preceeding exercise (i.e., SweetTarts) blunts
the release of growth hormone.
As to your question about thyroid
activity: reduced carbohydrate diets (and reduced calorie
diets) sometimes decrease the activity of the enzyme that
converts T4 (the inactive form of thyroid hormone that is
released from your thyroid gland) to T3, the active form.
We sometimes give our own patients small amounts of T3 during
the weight loss phase of the program. Micronutrients also
play a role in this conversion, especially iron and magnesium,
so you might want to make sure that you have adequate levels
of both. (You need to check your ferritin level (the storage
form of iron) before you take extra iron, because elevated
ferritin levels are a consequence of excess insulin and a
major risk factor for heart disease. Don't take iron if your
ferritin level is up.)
As to the CAD, a large number of
research papers have shown that the best way to lower insulin
levels is to eat smaller meals spread throughout the day--
a la PP. An equally large number have shown that a huge meal
(such as the reward meal specified in CAD) tends to cause
an hyper release of insulin--especially when the meal is in
the evening. We can't think of a single study showing that
a large meal--especially one containing all the carbohydrates
you can stuff in in an hour--reduces insulin levels. Now given
this information, how can we reconcile it with the fact that
some people DO lose weight on CAD? Here's how we think it
works: Many people eat everything they want all day long.
When they begin CAD, they can only eat everything they want
for one hour during the day, so it makes sense that they would
lose some weight. Given the biochemical realitites of the
situation, we suspect that most people who lose significant
amounts of weight on CAD probably eat a sensible low-carb
reward meal most of the time.
Since we wrote the section on eicosanoids,
we have had brain transplants. (Unfortunately when Mike wrote
that section he had fallen under the evil influence of our
good friend, Barry Sears.) We, too, now believe that flax
seed oil can be valuable and we take it ourselves and use
it on many of our patients. However, in some people (those
who are very ill, the elderly, diabetics, and certain others)
the enzyme that converts LA to GLA may function poorly, in
which case, the inhibitory effect of flax oil on delta-6-desaturase
may be enough to cause problems. Thanks for your questions.
|
| |
|
| |
| To Page 2 |
|
 |